Skip to content

서울천문동호회

?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부


A New Planetary Nebula Discovered from the Mount Wilson Observatory

Designation PN G75.5+1.7
Faint "Bubble" Nebula in Cygnus - Imaged on 05 July 2008 by Dave Jurasevich
Astro-Physics 160 mm refractor @ f/5.7 or 912 mm focal length
12 ea x 1200 sec exposures combined
Imaged through a Tru-Balance 6nm Hydrogen Alpha filter with STL-11000M camera


*** AP 160mm @f/5.7이면, e-160으로도 충분히 발견 가능했다는 말인데...


그럼, 발견자의 변을 들어봅시다. ^.~


The Story Behind the Discovery of “The Cygnus Bubble” PN G 75.5+1.7

  

The first known observation of a planetary nebula was made by the famous comet hunter Charles Messier on July 12, 1764 when he discovered the Dumbbell Nebula M27 in the constellation Vulpecula. The English astronomer William Herschel quickly added to the list by ferreting out an additional 33 planetaries by the year 1794. Over the intervening years scores of additional nebula have been discovered by amateur and professional astronomers alike. Today they are still being found albeit predominately by professional search programs such as IPHAS and MASH, that data-mine the northern and southern galactic plane in wavelengths conducive to detecting these gems of the Milky Way. The use of large Earth-based telescopes these current programs employ in their research, coupled with the staggering surveys being conducted by satellites orbiting the planet, make finding a new “non-transient” deep sky object in the Milky Way galaxy or anywhere in the Universe by amateur astronomers a rare occurrence these days.

Almost 244 years to the day after Messier discovered M27, a new discovery was made in the constellation Cygnus with modest amateur equipment from the historic Mount Wilson Observatory, located high in the San Gabriel Mountains overlooking the Los Angeles Basin. Beginning on the night of 26 June 2008 and running through 06 July 2008, I was engaged in an ambitious project to digitally image a swath of the Milky Way from Gamma Cygni to the Crescent Nebula NGC 6888 in the Hydrogen-Alpha wavelength (656.3 nm), attempting to capture the beautifully intricate HII regions contained therein. The project, being a multi-night affair, was designed to image eight distinct and slightly overlapping sections of sky and stitch them together into a single, large mosaic using digital imaging techniques well known to most advanced amateur imagers. Excellent weather and exquisite seeing conditions allowed me to essentially complete the project on consecutive nights, finalizing data acquisition of Pane #7 on 05 July 2008 and Pane #8 on 06 July 2008. With these final two panes "in the bag" I completed data collection on a mosaic project having a total exposure time of 32 hours.

Exhausted from multiple late-night sessions, I nevertheless decided to immediately begin preliminary processing the last panes of the mosaic (Panes 7 and 8) to determine how they would “fit” into the finished product. Stacking and combining the twelve individual 20 minute frames of Pane #7 didn’t reveal anything particularly interesting in the faint background of that scene, my eye instead being naturally drawn to the ethereal Crescent Nebula NGC 6888 itself. I decided to do a non-linear histogram stretch on the image to closely examine it for any peculiarities. To my surprise, upon close examination I noticed the faint outline of what appeared to be a nearly symmetrical “bubble” embedded within a faint HII region just a mere one-half degree from NGC 6888. Believing this apparition was but an artifact of my post-processing or an internal reflection in my imaging train, I decided to investigate further by examining an image I had taken of that exact area a year earlier using a different optical configuration and camera orientation. Again, “stretching” the histogram of this earlier image (taken 19 July 2007), I noticed this odd looking object at the very same location. At that point I knew it wasn’t an artifact but indeed a real object of unknown provenance.

Discovering a new object in some sense is both a blessing and a curse. After the initial excitement of discovery wears off, the hard work begins. Though still tired from my late-night endeavors, I began what would become an exhaustive search for information on clues to the nature of this odd object I had found. Little did I know where my investigations would lead or to the amount of work that would be required to satisfy my curiosity and ultimately lead to that Eureka moment when I knew I had found something previously undiscovered. Poring over every catalog I could find related to objects of this type and encompassing this area of the Milky Way, I could not find a single reference to this object in the professional literature. My next avenue of research led me to investigate currently running professional programs mining the Milky Way for new discoveries of this type. Again, I drew a blank and became even more convinced the time was at hand to file a report with the International Astronomical Union (IAU) through the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams (CBAT), which I did on 10 July 2008. Cutting to the quick, after filing initial and supplementary reports totaling 53 pages, spending many more hours investigating additional sources provided to me by Dr. Daniel Green of the IAU, allowing review time for the opinions of professionals with expertise in the field of planetary nebulae, and engaging in a cordial series of exchanges in defense of my claim, on 16 July 2009 the IAU issued Electronic Bulletin No. 1876 announcing my discovery of this new object.

I’ve learned a few things in the nearly one year between my filing of an initial report with the IAU and the release of Bulletin No. 1876. Perhaps the most important thing gleaned from the experience was that the IAU/CBAT is really geared more towards the reporting of “transient” objects such as comets and supernovae. In its own words,

"The CBAT is the official worldwide clearinghouse for new discoveries of comets, solar-system satellites, novae, supernovae, and other transient astronomical events. It aims to serve the astronomical community in the spirit of the mandate of the Smithsonian Institution: to aid in the increase and diffusion of knowledge; as such, together with its sister projects (the Minor Planet Center and the International Comet Quarterly), the CBAT serves to lead the SAO in this mandate in terms of public visibility."
The IAU is really not equipped to handle discoveries of a “non-transient” nature such as planetary nebulae. Thanks to the patient understanding and guidance of Dr. Daniel Green of the IAU however, I was nevertheless guided through the process of reporting and defending my discovery claim. I look upon this as a personal favor by Dr. Green and am forever indebted to him for his guidance over that long year. In hindsight, I now recognize that the more direct path to pursue in staking a claim of discovery is to publish the findings in a professional journal as soon as possible. That can be a daunting task for an amateur astronomer not familiar with or connected to the professional community; however it is the preferred method.

Finally, I’d like to leave fellow amateur astronomers with some general insight gained from this experience in the hopes of assisting them in pursuit of this noble hobby. One should never assume that he or she cannot make a contribution to the field of astronomy, believing that amateurs are not equipped to compete with professionals on any level. In this golden age of technology, amateur astronomers are being recognized by the professional community for their contributions. Compared to the level of relatively simple instrumentation available to amateur astronomers just a few decades ago, the powerful and technically advanced equipment of today can and does yield meaningful results. Digital imaging has opened a vast arena of research which amateurs have exploited, running the gamut from taking ‘pretty pictures” to photometric measurements of the periodic dimming of stars resulting from exosolar planet transits. For those like myself who are content with the aesthetic endeavor of producing “pretty pictures”, I urge you to critically scrutinize your images for anything unusual in the field of view before posting them on the Internet. You may find a hidden treasure buried deep among the ubiquitous stars on your image; a gem lying there for countless eons just waiting to be discovered.


Dave Jurasevich
18 July 2009


자유게시판

서천동 회원들이 풀어가는 자유로운 이야기

List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
공지 볼트 너트가 필요하죠? -- ** 25년9월19일 도메인,웹호스팅 만기일 '오선'** 3 file 홍두희 2014.10.02 26687
3409 회원 작품전 사진 퍼가도 되는지요? 1 이윤범 2009.08.08 1350
3408 [re] 딴지? 2 file 홍두희 2009.08.04 857
» [re] Bubble성운...160mm 반사 망원경으로 처음 발견했더군요. ^.~ 1 file 공준호 2009.08.01 4617
3406 Bubble성운...혹시 이거 정확한 위치 아시는 분? 1 file 공준호 2009.08.01 1114
3405 오랜만에 양평 아지트(나뭇길) 가보려합니다. 5 오영열 2009.07.29 1078
3404 더운 여름 잘들 지내고 계십니까? ^.~ 5 file 공준호 2009.07.29 1099
3403 Shall we meet ? 2 file 오영열 2009.07.24 1018
3402 무주공산? 2 한호진 2009.07.24 1068
3401 중국 다녀왔습니다....만.. 3 오영열 2009.07.23 1068
3400 일식사진입니다. 2 file 박창목 2009.07.22 1108
3399 80mm굴절 만들기 3 file 한호진 2009.07.22 1098
3398 구름사이로.. 일식이... 3 file 유종선 2009.07.22 1078
3397 웨더닷컴. 2 file 한호진 2009.07.18 1584
3396 이 책 찾는 분이 계셨는데,,,, 2 file 홍두희 2009.07.14 927
3395 [독후감] 회지 서울하늘을 일고. 1 오영열 2009.07.13 1026
3394 별을 관측하려는 사람들에게 필요한 것 4가지. 4 홍두희 2009.07.13 976
3393 [잡담]해보기 준비상태... 6 오영열 2009.07.08 1074
3392 15일 경춘고속도로 개통되면.... 5 file 안정철 2009.07.08 1963
3391 포커서와 각종 결합문제.-090630 4 한호진 2009.06.29 1650
3390 선두 & 서천동. +사진. 5 file 홍두희 2009.06.24 1076
Board Pagination Prev 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 230 Next
/ 230

Seoul Astronomy Club © Since 1989, All Rights Reserved

Design ver 3.1 / Google Chrome 에 최적화 되어 있습니다.

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

나눔글꼴 설치 안내


이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소